Race:
Is it possible that we all came from the same two people?
All contents copyright ©
2014 by M.L. Wilson. All rights reserved. No part of this document or the
related files may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means
(electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written
permission of the publisher.
* * *
I can’t help but think this particular commentary is going to be
taken the wrong way by a great number of people. There is little which is more sensitive
a subject today than that of race. It seems that everything in our daily lives
is orchestrated by race. From the number of commercials which feature racial
minorities, from the number of job positions filled in a given company by racial
minorities to the music which is regarded as most popular. We are constantly
bombarded with the fact that as a people, we are made well aware of our
differences, but none so vast as our racial make-up. We dance around the subject and refuse to allow a airing of the matter without fear. To be called a racist in this day and age is almost a fate worse then death. Such a mindset doesn't really help the matter at all, but rather sweeps it under the rug. In the end the matter must still be dealt with.
The election of Barack
Obama as United States President was not unique because he is one of the few to
ascend to the White House directly from the Senate (there have only been three
who have preceded him: Garfield, Harding and Kennedy), nor is his election
regarded as noteworthy because of his uneven upbringing. (a product of a broken home being raised largely out of
country in a completely different culture with a stepfather who is Muslim)
Barack Obama’s election is regarded as noteworthy merely by the fact of his
race. Whatever one may think of the man’s politics, his legacy will be as the
first black man to be elected to the office of the President of the United
States. Nothing else he does (or does not do) will overshadow this one aspect
of his being. My question is simple: Why should his skin color matter to
anyone? Quite frankly I am confused by this import we place upon race and I suppose
I really always have been. We call people racist all the time when really these are people who are merely expressing an opinion. It may be seen as unpopular by some, but true racism? I rather doubt it. Perhaps I should explain.
I grew up in a suburb just south of
San Francisco, California on the coast. My first day of school saw me, a boy of
English/Irish extraction mixed in with a host of other kids of different races.
I thought nothing of it as to me, this was normal. My best friend at that young
age was a Hispanic boy and I honestly never gave a moment’s thought to his
heritage; I cared that we were friends and nothing more. Perhaps I was simply naïve,
but I tended to judge people by how they acted rather than their family
lineage. The other kids were no more in control over what race they were born
into than was I. To me, we were all just a bunch of kids and this was school. The
challenge was to get through it unscathed by the bigger kids and maybe make new
friends.
By the time I reached the 2nd
grade, my family moved to another suburb farther to the east of the San
Francisco Bay Area. This suburb was completely different. For one thing, it was
quite a bit more well-to-do. The other thing was that there were very few
minorities. For me, this was culture shock. I had never been in a classroom
with only white teachers and white kids. My first teacher was a very kind lady
Named Miss Roberts who was black. She more or less set the standard for teachers
for me. Now being faced with a white teacher in a predominately white suburban
town, I wasn’t certain what to expect.
As I grew, I learned that
people are people regardless of their skin color. When I entered the Air Force,
I was once again in a racial mix of people. I found that I gravitated towards
those whose company I enjoyed regardless of heritage. Of course being older,
there were impediments to this absent when I was a child. Racism is not only a
white on (fill in the race) issue, but is a problem people in general suffer
with. While my peers didn’t seem to have a problem with me, I experienced my
first real taste of racism from one of my sergeants. He was a black Viet Nam
War veteran and—there is no other way to put this—hated white people. Years
later I saw a routine by Chris Rock and I instantly thought of my First
Sergeant in the Air Force because Rock was describing him exactly.
Rock explained (in his own inimitable way) that the most racist people you will find are old black men. Now his reasoning is explained in that older black men experienced true racism themselves. Growing up in certain parts of the United States before the 1950s was not a good experience for most black people. The reconstruction period after the Civil War saw the advent of many prominent blacks to positions of real power in local, state and federal offices and thoughts of racism seemed finished. But old ways don’t fade away so easily and within less than ten years, the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan had formed to put the black man back in his "proper place." By the turn of the 20th century, racism against blacks was widespread—and very cruel. The lessons learned which led in part to the American Civil War appeared to have been forgotten.
Older black men who just
wanted to make a decent life for themselves and their families faced an uphill
battle simply because of the color of their skin. They saw family and friends
murdered and treated in despicable ways by the supposedly morally superior
whites. My first sergeant—who would have been born right around
1935—experienced all of this. To him, I was a self indulgent, ignorant little
white kid who couldn’t find his ass with both hands. The simple fact of the
matter is that he was right—to a point. I was not born of wealth and privilege,
just born white. However my First
Sergeant’s opinion of me was a description of many of my black and Hispanic
friends as well, but his own racism refused to allow him to see that. As far as
he was concerned, I was going to pay for how other white people had treated him
and his family when he was younger. It was lost on him that by treating me as he had been treated he had become the very thing he hated.
And the cycle continues. Or
does it? I never looked at my First Sergeant as a black man; I looked at him as
my superior. The color of his skin was irrelevant to me. My direct supervisor
was a black Master Sergeant and we got along just fine. He evidenced none of
the racism displayed by my First Sergeant who appeared to hate me simply
because of the color of my skin. While I didn’t enjoy the confrontation, it was
an interesting lesson for me. I’ll also add that it diminished him in my eyes.
I never respected the man as a result of such narrow thinking on his part. I
respected his rank and position, but he lost my respect as a man. I’m assuming
that was the opposite of what he had intended.
But this isn’t so much a
commentary on race relations as it is about race in general. Specifically, how
is it that as human beings we fractured into different “races” of people. I
need to start out by qualifying the term race here. We are all of one race:
Human. That we all have differences in appearance does not make us any more or
any less than another. I therefore find the term “race” a misnomer. I prefer to use the term "ethnicity" to define our differences; we are all of the human race with different ethnic makeups. However for the benefit of the reader and this
commentary, I’ll proceed on premise that we’re talking heritage or lineage when
referring to race.
The question remains: If
one believes the Biblical account, one is forced to make some interesting
conclusions with respect to race in the world today. How is it that if all of
us came from Adam and Eve and then later from just the eight people aboard Noah’s
Ark, there is such a divergent group of people today? Quite literally, it
cannot have happened the way orthodoxy says it happened. Human beings cannot
become this divergent in the short span of time since the great flood.
If one follows the Biblical account, the great flood with the Ark took place approximately 4500 to 5000 years ago. I won’t belabor the secular arguments that such a cataclysm couldn’t have occurred for a host of other reasons. For the moment, I want to simply focus on the racial aspect. Archaeologists have uncovered human remains which predate the time of the great flood by thousands of years. These remains are clearly different races. One famous example is remains which were found in present day Kennewick, Washington of a Caucasian man who died approximately 7300 to 7600 years ago. While Native American tribes in Washington State sued in Federal Court to assert a claim as to their heritage and “Kennewick Man,” the Federal Court ruled that there was no genetic justification for their claim. The remains were not of a Native American.
What is interesting about
this for me are two things: One, where the remains were found. It was believed
that man migrated on a land bridge across the Aleutians from Asian to arrive in
North America. Those who migrated would naturally be Asiatic in heritage. Kennewick
Man is not of such a heritage, yet there his is; buried in Washington State at
a time a when a Caucasian shouldn’t even exist.
Two is the fact that this time
line occurs well before the great flood. Already we have physical evidence of
racial disparity existing at a time when most Biblical scholars believe there
should be no racial disparity at all; we should have all looked pretty much
alike. Even Noah’s sons married second cousins which would have made them all
Semitic people.
According to the Human
Genome Project, the Jewish people are genetically their own race and have
maintained a purity of that race with is unrivaled by any other people on the
planet. Thus if one is to follow the Biblical account as orthodoxy has
intended, we should all look Semitic in appearance at the time of the great
flood; there should be no white or black people running around anywhere. Yet
the physical evidence seems to point in a different direction. Not only were
there white and black people all over the place, but they were in localities
they shouldn’t be. How is this possible? This is where the picture gets a bit
interesting—and controversial.
Before I get into the
answer as to what I have concluded is going on with the races, I would like to
give a bit of a history lesson with respect to Adolf Hitler and the Aryans.
Most people are aware that Hitler and one of his chief associates, Heinrich Himmler,
believed the Jewish people to be an inferior race. Hitler and Himmler believed
that they were born of the superior Aryan race and that mixing with the Jews
was decimating his people. But who were
the Aryans and why did Hitler and Himmler regard them as superior to the Jews?
This is a rather long and convoluted story of which no one seems to have
completely figured out, but it does have a bearing on my conclusions.
German archaeologist and ethnohistorian Gustaf
Kossinna (1858 – 1931) is widely perceived as being a catalyst for the ideas of
Aryan supremacy embraced by Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler. This from the Dictionary of Archaeology:
Kossinna was quite influential, in fact; his
early arguments attempting to define cultures in archaeological sites by using
specific artifact types were an early application of the cultural-historical
approach. Where Kossinna went wrong was by going to extremes, as shown by his
famous quote, "Sharply defined archaeological cultural areas correspond
unquestionably with the areas of particular people or tribes." He used
ethnohistory to search for the origins of specific ethnic groups, believing
there was a one-to-one relationship between modern and ancient ethnic groups,
something modern archaeologists know is not true. Kossinna definitely believed
that Germans were the descendants of a superior race he called the Germani; and
as such his theories fit right into the Hitler/Himmler concept of the Aryan
race.
Himmler convinced Hitler that they were both
descended from this superior race of people and only by restoration of this
bloodline, could Germany—and ultimately the entire world—benefit. While there
were many political reasons for using the Jews as scapegoats, Himmler was
beyond any of that and used the political upheaval in Europe in the 1930s as a
pretext for going ahead with the ethnic cleansing he was certain would cure
their ills.
Whether one is convinced Himmler and Hitler both
misinterpreted the information they used which guided them, it is a fact that
they were none-the-less convinced. So if Heinrich Himmler was convinced he was
descended from a separate race of people than were the Jews, is there any
legitimacy at all to the claim? Can such racial disparity be proven by the
evidence? This is where Archaeologists take over and insist that we all
descended from a common ancestor which most likely came out of Africa. For a
host of reasons, I reject that assertion, but the primary reason is that
despite their claims, there is no hard evidence supporting it.
There is a clash between what the evolutionists
assert as opposed to what the Biblical creationists assert. But now we also
have this competing theory which seems to claim that the races were divided
from the beginning. Is this at all possible? Can we even begin to imagine that
the individual races (or lineages) of human beings were made separate from the
very beginning? Let us explore this a moment.
In the very beginning we find a problem with the
Biblical book of Genesis. This is a little known problem to most even within
the church, however a schooled pastor should be at least vaguely aware of the
situation. Genesis 1:1 begins thus: “In the beginning, God created the heavens
and the earth.” Based upon that one line, we proceed upon the premise that
God Almighty created everything. As we continue to read, we see how the
universe was created and how human beings were created in what is thought by
orthodoxy to be only six calendar days. Without delving into the Young Earth/Old Earth Creationist debate, I would like to
simply address one thing about that opening verse in Genesis. That one thing is
that our understanding of it is wrong. It does not say, “…God created…” What it
actually says in the original Hebrew is: "In
the beginning, Gods created the
heavens and the earth.” The Hebrew word "God" (Elohim) is used here
and denotes a plurality.
I have read many
commentaries as to why this is. The Hebrew scholars usually point to the
multifold Spirit of God and owe that to the usage of the plurality in Genesis
1:1. Of course the Christian scholars point to the fact that this plurality is
describing the Holy Trinity. Two different perspectives on exactly why the god
in the very first line in Genesis is not exactly who he claims to be.
Two things which are readily
apparent to me in this opening portion of Genesis are as follows: One, there is
absolutely no continuity. Sometimes a plurality is used to denote God and other
times it is a singularity. One would think that if Moses wanted us to all be
aware of God's multifold Spiritual presence, he would have used the Hebrew
"Elohim" throughout rather than switching back and forth as he evidently
does. (Notwithstanding the word choice in Hebrew, Moses was conveying a
particular idea. I am well aware that Moses did not write Genesis in Hebrew as
the language did not then yet exist. Moses most likely wrote Genesis is a form
of hieratic or some other variation of Egyptian script. Regardless, later
translators clearly saw his word choice and translated accordingly.)
If one can accept that
Moses translated the story told to him by his father-in-law, Jethro of Midian
accurately, then one must accept that more than one “god” created the universe.
Who are these gods if not the Trinity or the many Spiritual “faces” of God
Almighty? The Apostle Paul gives us a glimpse as to who these “gods” truly are.
In his letter to the church at Ephesus, Paul admonishes about the Rulers,
Powers and Authorities over this present realm. (Ephesians 6:12) In fact, these entities are a focus of much
of Paul’s writings. He clearly states that it was these same Rulers, Powers and
Authorities which Christ makes a spectacle of upon the cross. (Colossians 2:15)
Peppered throughout the
early chapters of Genesis is the impression that there is more than one “god”
at work. (Genesis 1:26, 3:22, 11:7) Biblical Scholars press the issue that as
the Hebrew language contains approximately only 8700 words, a straight English
translation of the meaning is lost. I’ll point out that chronologically, the
Hebrew language also came long after the Genesis narrative and the possibility
of the same dearth of true understanding from the original language (probably
some form of proto-Sumerian) must then be entertained. Looking at the naked
evidence of the word choice as put down on papyrus by Moses using a hieratic
script (a proto-Egyptian script which came about alongside the more commonly
known hieroglyphic script), one is forced to conclude that a plurality in these
instances is pointing to several spiritual entities of vast power rather than
the many majestic attributes of the one true God. Because Biblical scholars
point out the fact that whenever a plurality is used to denote God it is
followed by other plural verbs, the lack of these plural verbs buttress their
case of there being only one god intended despite the word choice.
My problems with their
conclusion are thus: In the instances when a plurality to denote God is used
and is followed by a plural verb, it is done so to make quite clear that a
differentiation be made between the God of the Hebrews and other gods. Since
the Genesis narrative is primarily about the Hebrew people, the god of the
Hebrew people is the primary subject. Using Elohim to denote “god” in these
instances would then necessitate a clarification. However in the passages where
Elohim is used as outlined parenthetically above, there are no “other gods”
about whose legitimacy or authority is being called into question. The usage of
the plurality is therefore unnecessary in these instances if there is but one
god present. Yet, the oral narrative which Jethro imparted to Moses clearly
employed a plurality. Again, why not simply use El or Elo to denote Almighty
God in these passages? Must we constantly be forced to switch back and forth
from denoting His many majestic attributes to simply referring to Him alone? What
is the point of this if we are already well familiar with the one true God? The
constant reminders of God’s abilities would appear to me to be a useless
redundancy. Such parsing on the part of Biblical scholars is nonsensical and clearly
shows and agenda leading the evidence rather than the converse.
It is vitally important
to remember a few things about the book of Genesis. As I have already stated,
it was first a story told orally from one generation to the next over a very
long period of time. There was no “reader” when the story was first told.
Memorization was of paramount importance so extraneous information was pared
down to the essentials. Thus Jethro explained the story of creation to Moses as
he had learned it himself. He explained to Moses that “…gods created the heavens
and the earth,” because that is what he had been told. Moses doesn’t seem
to ask for any clarification with respect to these “gods” and merely takes
Jethro at his word on this score. This is truly fascinating if in fact Jethro
is introducing a new component to the narrative not already familiar to Moses.
Again the question is
asked: Is it possible that more than one god created the heavens and the earth?
If so, who are these gods and where are they today? Have they been banished? Do
we no longer see them? Are they still around us? Are these “gods” really the
fallen angels we so often hear about? These and many other questions are all
legitimate. I will endeavor to answer them to the best of my ability. First,
however, I think it is important to discuss whether or not such belief goes
against the teachings of the Bible. After all, the Gospel of John says that all
things came into being through Christ. If these “gods” created the heavens and
the earth and such was NOT actually created by the hand of God Almighty, then
doesn’t that leave us in a precarious situation? It seems to point out that
Jesus is lying. Let me explore that just a bit.
To begin with, we
really do need to define the players. Who and what is God Almighty? Is He a
being who manifests Himself in multifold ways as the Jews believe? Is God
Almighty an individual set apart in some form or fashion from Jesus Christ and
the Holy Spirit—the Trinity—as the Christians believe? Is the doctrine of the
Trinity even legitimate? If any of the aforementioned are true as far as is
believed by orthodoxy, then much of what I will write will make little sense. Thus
I am going to proceed on the premise that God Almighty is just that: God
Almighty. He exists outside of time, outside of space and is as Christ and Paul
described Him: “Invisible, living in an
unapproachable light which no one can see or has seen.” (1st
Timothy 6:16) God is everywhere at once and is in everything we can discern
with our five senses. There is nowhere anyone can go to escape the presence of
God. The elemental structure of Almighty God is so far beyond our ability to
understand, that it was necessary for God Almighty to interact with us through
intermediaries. It isn’t that He had to do this; He desired to teach us more
about Himself utilizing this methodology. There is a reason for everything God
does and when we as human beings anthropomorphize Him, we throw most of Him
away. That having been said, how can we in our limited humanity ever see God?
God answered this problem in giving us two ways in which He presented Himself
to the human creation.
I will quickly clarify
a point here so that the reader is not taken too far off by what I am saying. I
wish to make it very clear that God Almighty is the author of our eternal essence.
The spirit which makes up who we are comes from God Almighty. To that end, God
Almighty is our creator. Nothing I have ever come across has shown me that this
is not true. The body we inhabit on this planet, however, is another matter
altogether. Our bodies are a product of this temporal realm. We will not take
our bodies with us when we transition to be at Christ’s side. Our bodies remain
behind and return to the earth from which they came. They remain behind because
they belong here. We are all familiar that death robs us of the person we
loved, even though their body very much remains. The essence of the person
vanishes from the body. It is this essence—this spirit—which God Almighty
created. Do not conflate the body with the spirit; the two are not the same. Christ
Himself said,
“Do
not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be
afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”
- Matthew 10:28
Christ clearly shows
the differentiation between the two separate components which make up our
earthly selves. He places far more import upon our spirit than our flesh. As
Christians, this fact should remain forefront in our minds. Sadly for too many,
it does not and far too much time and effort is wasted by good people
attempting to meld the body and soul together. The two are essentially
incongruent as Paul pointed out in Romans:
“…but
I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of
my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members.
Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death?
Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I
myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh
the law of sin.”
- Romans 7:23-25
Returning to the ways
upon which God presented himself to the human creation, the first method God
used to allow humans to “see” him was to utilize spiritual entities of almost
unlimited power. We call these beings angels, but that is not a terribly
accurate term where applied to these particular spiritual entities. An angel is
defined more as a messenger. These beings were less messengers than they were
administrators. Their goal was to create a realm, populate that realm with a creation
capable of housing the spirit with which God Almighty could imbue, and then
present the face of God Almighty to that hybrid corporeal/spirit creation.
Genesis chapter one
outlines the creation of humanity by the majority of these Spiritual entities.
(Such beings are referred to as Celestial beings in 2nd Peter 2:10 and Jude 8)
Genesis Chapter 2 begins with an outline of the creation of one particular tribe
of human being by one particular Celestial being. This Celestial being is named
Helel, which in the Hebrew means, “Light
Bearer.” (Isaiah 14:12)
Orthodoxy has
erroneously come to the conclusion that Genesis Chapter 1 and Genesis Chapter 2
are just an initial telling and then a more in-depth recap of the creation
narrative. However as we have already discovered, the Genesis account was first
presented as an oral history passed down from one generation to the next. This
went on until Moses wrote it down. Outside of Moses specific tribe of people,
however, the story continued to be told orally as it had been for thousands of
years. Thus a true reading of Genesis Chapter 1 outlines the general creation
of the WHOLE realm—universe, planets, time, et al. Then beginning with Genesis Chapter
2, the focus narrows dramatically and shifts only to the tribe of people
specific to those who would eventually become known as the Hebrews. It is these
people which the Celestial being, Helel, created and administered over. His job
was to present the “face” of Almighty God to this creation. In this manner,
Almighty God would have a relationship by proxy with His creation. This was the
methodology God Almighty used for a specific, but multifold purpose. Each and
every tribe of people created upon the whole earth were created in a similar
manner by the hand of a Celestial being.
My lineage is
English/Irish. I also have some Germanic and American Indian in the mix as
well. I am like most people on the earth in that I am a mutt as far as my
lineage is concerned. I am most certain that based upon my conclusions I am not
of the creation of the Celestial Helel. That makes me no better or worse, it is
simply a fact. My lineage came from the hand of another Celestial being. I do
not know the beings name, but I am most certain that just as my lineage was
created, so were others. Those others are as much human as I am, but they look
differently.
I am going to use an
example which most will find lacking or perhaps even gauche, but it will have
to suffice for the purpose of this illustration. Consider that an auto maker designs
and creates many different looking automobiles. They all fulfill an essential
like function: transporting a driver and cargo, but they come in a variety of
different shapes and sizes. I have often used a car and driver metaphor to
explain the body and spirit. We humans do not realize that we are like the
driver of a car. Because of this, we allow the car to drive us never
understanding that we have ultimate control. We can step on the brake or the
gas, we can steer left or right or straight, we can direct the car forward or
put it into reverse. Most of us will spend the lifetime of the car encased
within never realizing that all of the control of the vehicle was within our reach
the whole time. Then the car finally breaks down for the last time and is
beyond repair. We are forced to exit the vehicle and then see with clarity that
it was really nothing but a shell; a mindless machine to which we gave over far
too much control.
This is an imperfect,
but hopefully somewhat adequate analogy between our spirits and our bodies. We
can be created by Ford, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, Kia, GAZ, Nissan,
etc., but we’re all just vehicles. We have different shapes and colors; some of
us are faster than others, some of us are larger than others. Some make a
different sound than others, but despite the differences, we’re still all the
same. We aren’t chairs, we aren’t rocks, we aren’t trees, we aren’t
battleships; we’re all a variation of a motorized vehicle which runs on wheels.
The cars may have been created by
separate companies, but the drivers are all created and supplied by God
Almighty. Because of that, there is absolutely no difference from one driver to
another; all are loved equally by their creator notwithstanding the type of car
they drive.
These Celestial
entities—the creators of our “temporal vehicles,” were our first link with the
creator of our spirit “the driver.” But this proved to be an imperfect means by
which God Almighty could connect with His spiritual creation within this
temporal realm. This is not due to any deficit on the part of God Almighty; He
was well aware of the outcome and designed it as such. One of the aspects of
the spiritual realm which is lost on most Christians or people of faith is that
God Almighty is teaching these spiritual entities at the same time He is also
teaching us. By failing to fulfill their obligation to be the “face of God
Almighty” to humanity, these Celestial entities realized that the bias they
hold against humanity is completely unfounded and misplaced. God was able to
show them that they are really no better than us humans. God then removed them
from their role as administrators over humanity and took that role upon Himself
in the personage of Jesus Christ. Christ freed us from the yoke of the
Celestial’s rule and freed us to be with Him upon our passing from this
temporal realm. At some point in the future (and I am not going to attempt to
blow smoke at anyone on this score; I do not yet know how or when), Christ will
take over administration of the entire realm from the Celestial entities as
well. Thus far, God Almighty has allowed them to continue in this role, even
though Christ has all authority.
Thus in the meanwhile,
we will exist here on this planet for a very short period of time as measured
against the whole in our different colored and shaped “cars,” all attempting to
navigate our way through the world until our cars are no longer viable and we
have to exit.
I earlier had mentioned
Hitler, Himmler and their affinity for the Aryan race. I return to that now to
point out the inherent danger in regarding one group of people as superior to
others. Stripped of our bodies, we are all spirit. We are all created purposely
by the hand of Almighty God. We are all given an opportunity to visit this
realm no matter how briefly. To those of us who are given much, much is
expected. This is not to only mean those with money are to use that money to
help others. That is certainly a part of it, but Christ is speaking more to the
point of what we do with the opportunities this small patch of time on this
earth affords us. Will we use our time to attempt to surmount others, to elevate
ourselves over other people, or will we use our time as Christ intended and be
His face to our fellow man? Can we succeed where the Celestial rulers failed?
The flesh constantly
pulls at us. The body is extraordinarily needy. We are so closed off from one
another while we reside in the flesh that if we understood the pure unity that
is in Christ, I don’t think we could bear to return to the isolation of the
body. Much of this isolation could be overcome if we were honest and open with
one another in love, but our humanity prevents such from being a part of our nature.
Our bodies are a product of this realm. This realm is finite and so is our
flesh. Our fleshly order of thinking is therefore placed on a default setting
of “finite” which must be consciously changed. In order to change this setting,
one must first be made aware of the need for the change. This is the function
of the Christian; one who is in a relationship with Christ and who seeks to
help others to join in that relationship. This is not a job for the
fainthearted or the prideful. When Christ told us to count the cost of being a
disciple, He was not kidding. (Luke 14:25 – 34)
Orthodoxy struggles
with much of these concepts because orthodoxy is born of people who allowed the
“cars” to do the driving rather than taking the control given to them by Christ’s
authority. As I have highlighted in other commentaries, the pure truth of the
Gospels have long been overshadowed by the agenda’s of man. Does such mean that
I am not wrong in my conclusions? I suppose the most honest answer I can give
is that I have reached my conclusions through much prayer and research. I had
long pondered the situations respecting the various races on this planet and further
pondered why if we are all cousins of a kind, we would believe some are better
(or worse) than others. Orthodoxy had no adequate answer to the question and
really neither did secular anthropology.
I had come to an early
conclusion that perhaps the variant in racial makeup came about when “God”
confused the languages of the people at the tower of Babel, but moved away from
that model as it was simply not tenable. Later based upon finding in genetics,
I considered that Adam and Eve were most likely created looking like a mix of
all the variant of races which exist now on the planet. Through breeding with
brothers and sisters sharing similar features and colors, certain genes were made
dominate and others were made recessive. Over years, the dominate genes in
these particular groups settled into what we now regard as present day racial
make-up. I had to also abandon that model as untenable. It presumed far too
much which was not supported by the evidence.
In the end the question
remained with no answers. My conclusion with respect to the racial or lineage
question I hold at present is not any more fantastic than is the Theory of
Evolution, or Panspermia. If one is more comfortable believing these Celestial beings
I have described as our creators and initial administrators as
extraterrestrials, I suppose that is up to them. To describe a spiritual entity
as an extraterrestrial would essentially be correct as they are not native to
this realm. That they are in any way corporeal or humanoid in the sense we
usually ascribe to ETs, I would have to politely disagree.
In the end, it is
important to realize that Jesus Christ is creator God Almighty. He came to free us from our Celestial oppressors and when the time comes when we last close our eyes on this earth, we will become very aware that the variety of races enjoyed by
humanity was a gift given to us which we have by and large squandered.
No comments:
Post a Comment